Agora você pode se inscrever por RSS

Cadastre seu e-mail
Mostrando postagens com marcador divorce. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador divorce. Mostrar todas as postagens

quinta-feira, fevereiro 20, 2014

Oral argument in the courts

.

Arguing a client's case before a judge or jury in a court of law is the traditional province of the barrister in England, and of advocates in some civil law jurisdictions. However, the boundary between barristers and solicitors has evolved. In England today, the barrister monopoly covers only appellate courts, and barristers must compete directly with solicitors in many trial courts. In countries like the United States that have fused legal professions, there are trial lawyers who specialize in trying cases in court, but trial lawyers do not have a de jure monopoly like barristers. In some countries, litigants have the option of arguing pro se, or on their own behalf. It is common for litigants to appear unrepresented before certain courts like small claims courts; indeed, many such courts do not allow lawyers to speak for their clients, in an effort to save money for all participants in a small case. In other countries, like Venezuela, no one may appear before a judge unless represented by a lawyer. The advantage of the latter regime is that lawyers are familiar with the court's customs and procedures, and make the legal system more efficient for all involved. Unrepresented parties often damage their own credibility or slow the court down as a result of their inexperience.

Research and drafting of court papers

Often, lawyers brief a court in writing on the issues in a case before the issues can be orally argued. They may have to perform extensive research into relevant facts and law while drafting legal papers and preparing for oral argument.

In England, the usual division of labour is that a solicitor will obtain the facts of the case from the client and then brief a barrister (usually in writing). The barrister then researches and drafts the necessary court pleadings (which will be filed and served by the solicitor) and orally argues the case.

In Spain, the procurator merely signs and presents the papers to the court, but it is the advocate who drafts the papers and argues the case.

In some countries, like Japan, a scrivener or clerk may fill out court forms and draft simple papers for lay persons who cannot afford or do not need attorneys, and advise them on how to manage and argue their own cases.

Advocacy (written and oral) in administrative hearings

In most developed countries, the legislature has granted original jurisdiction over highly technical matters to executive branch administrative agencies which oversee such things. As a result, some lawyers have become specialists in administrative law. In a few countries, there is a special category of jurists with a monopoly over this form of advocacy; for example, France formerly had conseils juridiques (who were merged into the main legal profession in 1991). In other countries, like the United States, lawyers have been effectively barred by statute from certain types of administrative hearings in order to preserve their informality.

Client intake and counseling (with regard to pending litigation)

An important aspect of a lawyer's job is developing and managing relationships with clients (or the client's employees, if the lawyer works in-house for a government or corporation). The client-lawyer relationship often begins with an intake interview where the lawyer gets to know the client personally, discovers the facts of the client's case, clarifies what the client wants to accomplish, shapes the client's expectations as to what actually can be accomplished, begins to develop various claims or defenses, and explains her or his fees to the client.

In England, only solicitors were traditionally in direct contact with the client. The solicitor retained a barrister if one was necessary and acted as an intermediary between the barrister and the client. In most cases barristers were obliged, under what is known as the "cab rank rule", to accept instructions for a case in an area in which they held themselves out as practising, at a court at which they normally appeared and at their usual rates.

Legal advice

Legal advice is the application of abstract principles of law to the concrete facts of the client's case in order to advise the client about what they should do next. In many countries, only a properly licensed lawyer may provide legal advice to clients for good consideration, even if no lawsuit is contemplated or is in progress. Therefore, even conveyancers and corporate in-house counsel must first get a license to practice, though they may actually spend very little of their careers in court. Failure to obey such a rule is the crime of unauthorized practice of law.

In other countries, jurists who hold law degrees are allowed to provide legal advice to individuals or to corporations, and it is irrelevant if they lack a license and cannot appear in court. Some countries go further; in England and Wales, there is no general prohibition on the giving of legal advice. Sometimes civil law notaries are allowed to give legal advice, as in Belgium. In many countries, non-jurist accountants may provide what is technically legal advice in tax and accounting matters.

quarta-feira, novembro 20, 2013

Facebook vira dedo duro e faz valor da pensão alimentícia aumentar

.
Na audiência da Vara de Família, chega cabisbaixo, com problemas financeiros e desempregado. Porta a fora da sala da juíza tem no álbum “eu na minha casa nova”, fotos do Carnaval de camarote em Corumbá, cervejas caras e viagens até de Cruzeiro. O Facebook virou prova nas audiências de assuntos de família, em disparado nos casos de pensão alimentícia e briga de bens em união estável. As redes sociais norteiam os acordos ou não, diante da 1ª Vara de Família de Campo Grande.
 
A juíza da Vara, Saskia Elisabeth Schwanz, explica que a Justiça leva em consideração duas situações ao fixar os valores de pensão alimentícia a serem pagos aos filhos: a condição financeira do pai e as necessidades da criança.
 
Com um trabalho voltado à conciliação, em 90% dos casos em que aparece o ‘Facebook’ entre as provas, a juíza termina ação em comum acordo entre as partes. “Normalmente eles nem negam, porque no Facebook você mesmo pôs a prova. Ele mesmo postou”, exemplifica.
 
Os processos correm em segredo de justiça e imagino cá que debaixo de muito barraco e cara de pau. Na revisão da pensão alimentícia, ao mesmo tempo em que o pai pede para diminuir o valor, alegando estar desempregado, aparece nas fotos viajando.
 
Um episódio a ex-mulher apontou a prova: uma foto na rede social em que ele aparecia, dias antes de entrar com o pedido de revisão, tomando um uísque de R$ 600. Outra situação envolveu o pai da criança, que alegava não ter condições de pagar o valor, pulando Carnaval em Corumbá.
 
“Espera aí, pode ir no Carnaval e não pode pagar pensão para a sua filha?” questionou a juíza. A magistrada afirma que o foco não é a briga entre o casal e sim atender às necessidades da criança. E que todo mundo pode pular o Carnaval, desde que depois não deixe faltar nada aos filhos.
 
Ela mesmo brinca que ninguém que vai ao Carnaval resiste de postar no Facebook, mas admite que na audiência se passa de coitado e no perfil é diretor. “A pessoa se entrega, mostra várias viagens. Teve um que dizia que só podia pagar tanto, a hora que você via a lista de trabalhos dele, dava um salário enorme”, completa.
 
Em outro caso, ao pedir para pagar menor valor, foi surpreendido com revelações que ele mesmo postou: uma viagem no Cruzeiro com a atual mulher.
 
 
 
Geralmente eles só se dão conta disso depois que já virou processo. A Justiça vai se adequando à modernidade e está sempre antenada no que há de novo”, ressalta.
 
E não adianta espertinho sair da audiência e apagar a conta porque não vai escapar. A Justiça pode, embora a juíza entrevistada nunca tenha precisado pedir, aos provedores de internet que forneçam as informações excluídas.
 
Nos casos de união estável, a prova pode estar na foto daquele Natal passado juntos ou então na data de relacionamento sério. “Eles discutem a data de união estável, um diz que não estava junto em janeiro, quando comprou um imóvel, mas lá aparece a foto do Natal do ano anterior”, cita.
 
Como nas redes sociais o exagero impera, um dos episódios em que o pai postou “eu na minha casa nova”, a argumentação foi de que na verdade era a residência de um amigo. A saída foi provar o contrário.
 

Coprights @ 2017, Blogger Templates Designed By Templateism | Templatelib